The strongest wording Chris' use in the comparison video regarding the Z6 is "[...]I still feel the overall AF performance may be be the weakest of the three". It doesn't look like new R buyers are rushing to buy the best RF lenses at lower prices. It sounds similar to … Too bad Fujifilm didn't jump into full frame for the beginning. Yongnuo has patented a modular camera system aiming to best smartphone cameras, Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2020, DPReview TV: Best entry-level full frame mirrorless – Nikon Z5 vs. Canon EOS RP, Nikon Z5 sample gallery: new samples from DPReview TV, Nikon Z5 added to studio scene comparison tool, gallery updated with Raw conversions, Nikon might just have made the best entry-level full-framer, Sigma 35mm F2 DG DN Sample Gallery (DPReview TV), Laowa 15mm F4.5 Zero-D Shift lens sample gallery (DPReview TV), Review: The DJI Pocket 2 is a vlogging machine you can take anywhere (even in your pocket), Review: the DJI Mavic Mini 2 is the perfect drone for beginners, Field review: The Olympus M.Zuiko 12-100mm F4 IS Pro goes to Oz, (Select) Android smartphones now work with Profoto's professional lights via Profoto Camera app beta, Sony's new Visual Story iOS app is designed for wedding and event photographers, Hands-on with new Sigma 35mm and 65mm F2 DG DN lenses, DPReview TV: Sigma 35mm F2 DG DN and 65mm F2 DG DN review, Sigma 35mm F2 DG DN sample gallery (DPReview TV), Sigma introduces 24mm F3.5, 35mm F2 and 65mm F2 lenses for E and L mounts, Vazen announces the 65mm T2 1.8x anamorphic lens for MFT camera systems, rounding out the 3 lens lineup, Meyer Optik Görlitz releases redesigned Primoplan 75mm F1.9 II lens for a handful of mounts, Canon confirms August ransomware attack, notes past and current employees affected, Video: The 'surprising' origin story of Kodak Aerochrome film, Gear of the Year: Barney's choice (part 2) - Reflex-Nikkor 1000mm F11, DPReview TV: Best enthusiast full-frame mirrorless camera, Treat yourself 2020: The ultimate photographers' gift guide, iPhone mount converts an Apple Watch into a live viewfinder for selfies and vlogging, Gear of the Year: Richard's choice - Canon RF 800mm F11 IS STM, DPReview TV lens review: Shift your perspective with the Laowa 15mm F4.5 shift lens, MIOPS launches Kickstarter campaign for Flex, its featured-packed smart camera gadget, Fujifilm adds a 400MP capture mode to its GFX 100 camera with 3.00 firmware update, The Panasonic S1H and GH5 are the best cameras for videographers, Fujifilm Introduces GFX 100 IR for 100MP infrared imaging, Sigma to release a new 'DN' lens for mirrorless camera systems via livestream on December 1, Video: 'One Shot' shows what it takes to capture an iconic image at the Olympic games, MonsterAdapter's new LA-KE1 adapter brings autofocus, aperture control to Pentax K-mount lenses on Sony E-mount cameras, Gear of the Year: Barney's choice (part 1) - Fujifilm X100V, Dario's desk (because I don't have one) by adriparro, Excellent Raw image quality with good detail capture, noise performance and dynamic range, Raw noise performance at high ISOs bested slightly by more modern sensors, Default JPEG noise reduction can be a tad heavy-handed, On-sensor phase detect pixels well-corrected for with no obvious banding in shadow regions (unlike Z6/Z7), Default 'Auto' shutter mode uses EFCS at lower shutter speeds (to avoid shutter shock) and switches to mechanical at higher speeds to avoid weird bokeh effects (the top mechanical speed is 1/8000 sec). Still has more dynamic range than z6 check photos to photons. I originally thought about getting a prime for doing portrait shoots, but then I just took this lens in the 50-70 range and the results are always incredibly good. If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. Compare the subtle gradations of skin tone on the Canon shots at ISO 400 and 800, vs the watercolour effect on the Fuji image. (Well, you can’t “feel” the dual SD slots, but you know they’re there, giving you more peace of mind than any other camera in its price range!). So if it seems to be a stop better than other APS-C cameras in high ISO, then wouldn't that get it in the neighborhood of a lot of full framers? Have you seen the D750 sensor measurements? Native lenses that match the body are the best option if you can get it. There’s one to make most people happy no matter what the brand. Review: Does the Canon Rebel T8i DSLR make sense in an increasingly mirrorless world? That should allow him to form his own opinion. We are in fact, number one-in transmission rates, hospitalization rates, death rates. There you go. I shoot both S glass and F glass on my Z6. However, in addition to paying nearly 30% more than the Z5’s price tag, you’ll also have to give up the dual card slots and the traditional design form factor with its comfortable ergonomics and full-featured controls. Love the cameras analogue controls though. To get right to the verdict: the Z5’s autofocus is great! Planning to get the body, ftz first to use with existing AF-S lenses for the time being. Sigma's new primes promise very good performance and light weight, when paired with L-mount and Sony E-mount mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras. Honestly, though? "Thoughts" is paid to post pro-Canon and anti-Sony propaganda. Nikon has certainly progressed to a point where autofocus reliability, in general, is a non-issue for most photographers. @johnami We talk about specialized cameras stores, online or no, which sell it at 1900€On PhotoCineComedie, it has a little 100€ promotion, but that's all. That's such a lame lie. Their F mount trinity of 35mm, 50mm, 85mm f1.8 can be bought new for about $1000/€1000. After reading the review here I thought I was making a good decision in purchasing the camera. Nothing the Z5 doesn't do better except all the cases when you need autofocus... :-). except IBIS everything for much less, at least here, and it is not incl adapters) for. The word is out that Canon and Sony are very very hungry wanting your business. So, the Z5 wins, hands-down. Also, this crop for video means that the over-sampled 4K video from the Z6 will appear much sharper and finely detailed, unfortunately. The Z5 is equipped with two SD card slots that are compatible with the UHS-II protocol, … No built in flash is a mystery. It’s a whole different thing, however, to figure out how to actually CONTROL the focus points, namely not just how you move the AF point around the viewfinder, but, how do you instruct the AF system to begin tracking a subject around the viewfinder, to follow its every move, and then stop tracking, at will? The EVF is very grainy in dark conditions , at least on mine. Camera makers need to make more compelling FF at the 2k level if they want buyers to buy in. The situation is still dangerous of course and cannot be treated lightly, but we are far away from the fear that has been circulating in the first half of 2020. A colour photographer would be much better off with a Nikon full frame 35mm camera than anything else on the market. There is a list of people waiting for months. How do you know? Nikon Z5 review: Image Quality and Low Light Performance Image quality from the Z5 is very good, even if the full-frame sensor isn’t as up-to-date as the one in the Z6. If you look at our ISO Invariance test, you can see that using a low ISO in low light conditions and brightening it, leaves little meaningful difference in the outcome compared to using a high ISO in the first place. The 24-70 f/4 is such a great lens. But at more moderately high ISOs, like 3200$(document).ready(function() { $("#icl-5211-1396519058").click(function() { ImageComparisonWidgetLink(5211); }); }) the difference in noise between the Z5 and Z6/a7 III is negligible. They are crap! Just, HOW? That's why reviewers here and elsewhere spend so much time talking about the video performance of mirrorless cameras. Canon RP is currently the cheapest, but then IQ is compromised with limited DR. Yet the sensor of the Rp is nowhere close to that of the D3x. I would have preferred around 5.5, but it's still faster than the RP, and similar to A7RII (5fps). BTW, did they ever resolve that overheating problem? I also maintain that DPR has been slightly too uncritical of the Z5s unbalanced feature set for the price, Since nobody will be using 4K on this camera, the IBIS is also rendered largely superfluous. Thanks for making my point! B&H | Adorama | Amazon. Sounds like you haven't tried a Z camera since the 3.0 firmware update, or you haven't tried a Z camera at all and are just repeating what you hear from others that have never shot a Z camera... Read how they analyze products and grade them. Great hybrid performance. Here is a brief look at the main features of Nikon Z5 and Nikon D750 before getting into our more detailed comparison. But arguably better quality glass. Your handle is FuifilmXT3 and you're dissing a Nikon camera. I wonder how it compares to the X-T4. Evidently he is a sociopath who has no life outside these forums. Good point, stills photography is such a niche these days, who buys a camera just for that ;)As mentioned by cosmicnode, if the camera was great at video also it might have got 90+. A7R2 = 42 BSI megapixelsZ5 = 24 Non-BSI megapixelsA7R2 = 4K with no video cropZ5 = 4K massive video crop. We are in a 2nd lock down and unemployment is 20%+ and I figure other places are suffering as well. Unfortunately Panasonic is not a brand that I expect to be around in the market for much longer judging by their small market share of a shrinking market. Nikon opted to use their conventional CMOS sensor with this camera, rather than implementing the Backside Illumination (BSI) structure found in the higher-end Z6. So if you’ve ever picked up a Z6 and thought that it felt comfortable and was a generally well-made camera, (we sure think so!) It is actually Sony which lost half of FF mirrorless market overnight to Canon and Nikon. The Z5's dynamic range is very good. Specifically, we compared the two most important things: image quality, and autofocus performance. The 50/1.8 S rivals the Otus at 5x the price. [Related Reading: Nikon Z50 Review | Getting Mirrorless Right The First Time?]. They were able to reduce cost without impacting value. The Z5 is Nikon's brand new entry-level full-frame mirrorless camera, sitting below the mid-range Z6 and flagship Z7 models in the three-camera lineup, and above the APS-C sensor Z50. Your account will be downgraded to a Free Account at the end of your Premium Membership trial. They'll get there on the cheaper lenses. Key takeaways: Not even close. Besides the 3 best pro f2.8 zooms are the Nikon S ones- The R5 and R6 are the first two truly appealing Canon cameras in more than 10 years, but they are way over priced and not selling well. Over ISO 100, detail in colour pictures is much better than anything one can wheedle out of an APS-C Fujifilm camera. Once more in all caps - the FTZ ADAPTER IS AWESOME. On a few rare occasions, the price has dropped even lower. Nikon 24-70 2.8 - $2300Sony 24-70 2.8 - $2200, Nikon 70-200 2.8 - $2600Sony 70-200 2.8 - $2600, Nikon 50mm 1.8 - $600Sony 55mm 1.8 - $1000 (the cheaper Sony isn’t close to the same quality as the Nikon), Nikon 20mm 1.8 - $1050Sony 20mm 1.8 - $900, Nikon 35mm 1.8 - $850Sony 35mm 1.8 - $750, Nikon 24-200mm - $900Sony 24-240mm - $1050. Of course I know the Z6 exists. If that were true Nikon probably wouldn't be hooking everyone up with $50 FTZ adapters... What's wrong with FTZ adapters? The RP was closer to my budget and is smaller & lighter. Oh, and Canon also made the same compromise that Nikon made in terms of 4K video- the EOS RP crops to about ~1.6x and only records up to 4K 25p. Well if you aren't shooting video, then the Z5 would be the better option. I could keep going, but the takeaway is that the lenses are close in price and each company has some that are more/less expensive than the other. Looking for a Nikon D750 vs Nikon Z5 comparison? Most of these differences will not impact real world still photography. Beyond that, even the A9 II wasn’t reliable enough for what we’d consider acceptable for professional work like wedding receptions or dark theaters…, What does this tell us? Once. I was pretty disappointed with the camera. The Z50 is great to hold and use. The new Z series cameras do look intriguing, but I'm having no trouble wheedling clinically sharp details out of my Fuji when I want them. Any beginner, serious, or even professional photographer who is coming from another camera that is at least 5 years old will be truly impressed by what the Z5 offers. I was not happy. Also, it is not "the best value stills-oriented full-framer" camera out there, that honor currently belongs to the 42 megapixel BSI-sensor Sony A7R II, currently on sale for $1,298 (price range in 2020 has been from $1,298 to $1,798). Our initial verdict is that everything is great, (we love the dual SD card slots!) zoom for 1900 euros. Their leaders don't refuse free WHO test kits so they can funnel all the PPE through their son in law's personal businesses. I’ve used many brands and there are a lot of good cameras out there. i thought Canon is the darkside? Nikon provides the same subtlety with skin tone but in its default colours, skin tones will have a strong yellow cast. AF and AF‑D len… The elderly people and those at risk are cautious. We photo geeks love our acronyms, so how 'bout some new ones standing for "stills-oriented" or "video-oriented" camera engineering emphasis? iPhone Photography Tutorials (And Other Smartphones). Adapting lenses from other systems (most famously EF to Sony E mount) is fairly awful. Top Intro Compatible Lenses Incompatible Lenses Specifications The Nikon FTZ is a lens mount adapter that lets us use any F-Mount Nikon SLR or DSLR lens with varying extents of usefulness on Nikon's full-frame mirrorless cameras. Yes, my older ones looked a little bit waxy sometimes at 5000+, but you can imagine the abysmal light requiring such high ISO. The title of this article got me thinking; there's a trend building in there. A7RII uses pixel binning for full-frame 4K. What follows are the headiest products of 2020, the ones photographers really want. I don't understand Nikon's mirrorless strategy. I understand that it's quite a bit more expensive than the Z5. We compare the Canon EOS R6, Nikon Z6 II, Panasonic S5 and Sony a7 III. The Nikon Z5 continues to impress us. The Primoplan 75mm F1.9 II is a redesign of the original Primoplan 75mm F1.9 designed in 1936. If anything, the Z5 and Z6 being nearly identical despite the $600 difference in their original MSRPs, if nothing else, only really highlights just how much BETTER the Z5’s ergonomics are compared to its competition from Canon and Sony! In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing under $1000 and recommended the best. Fujifilm is unlikely to release a FF mirrorless in approx 35mm and given it's really a medical device manufacturer I suggest the camera division is under constant performance review. The event, which will show off a new 'DN' lens for mirrorless camera systems, is set to take place at 7am ET (4am PT) on December 1. The Nikon kit lens for the Z5 is the worst I've seen for any full frame - only 24mm @ F4 to 50mm @ F6.3 ! If you can live with XQD, Z6 is absolutely the best value, it has the same sensor as the mighty A7m3.When the Z6 came out I had a look, I loved it, and if it were not that stupid XQD, I would have bought one. Gee, I wonder why our economy is tanking even tho our stock market got a trillion dollars a day to stay afloat. While there is no size advantage over conventional DSLR lens size wise, you so get high quality EVFs and a larger AF point coverage area. Nikon Z6 Review – Does Sony Have Serious Competition? And we've been busy enjoying the last licks of summer with it by our side. The adapter will bring full autofocus, aperture control and EXIF data transfer capabilities to Pentax K-mount lenses when used on select Sony E-mount camera systems. But then, what else can we expect from someone who tells lies for money ? I like that I can get solid IQ, accurate AF, and plenty of manual controls for well under $2k. Both have hybrid AF systems and the A7R II actually has more points than the Z5. While our full Nikon Z5 review is underway, you can now see how the camera stacks up against its peers in our studio test scene, as well as some Raw conversions. Look at the DPR Comparison Tool. For instance, i went the EOS 10D, 20D...50D Route - and never looked at the xxxD, or even xxxxxD Series backwards, too much Issues i dislike, like one Dial (!) Fortunately there are systems that provides multitude of native lenses. You're adapting a Nikon lens to a later model Nikon camera. The 14-24mm f2.8 and 24-70mm f2.8 are the lighest, most compact and highest quality on the market. Thanks for posting an example, Bolton. Feels like the Panasonic S5 is much more value for for the money, AND the same price, at least in Sweden. But, quite honestly, it’s going to be pretty boilerplate–the older cameras are worse, the newest cameras, across the board, are great. Why do people keep saying RP is cheaper so therefore it must be the best VALUE full framer? I have eight F mount and three S lenses: for stills there is no performance difference. Real world education & resources from the most successful wedding photography studios in the world. Btw, D610 is still comparable good cameras now. In low light, switching over to auto White Balance, the Z5 does a good job$(document).ready(function() { $("#icl-5214-1223761440").click(function() { ImageComparisonWidgetLink(5214); }); }) keeping tones warm and natural-looking. There are many reasons for this and I am working on a more comprehensive post on this subject, but here is the short version: Z5: 7 year-old non-BSI sensor ISO range 50-102400Z6: Modern BSI sensor ISO range 50-204800, Z5: LCD screen 1 million dotsZ6: LCD screen 2 million dots, Z5: Massive 1.7x 4K video cropZ6: No video crop, Z5: Kit lens 24-50mm F4-F6.3 ($300 cost with body)Z6: Kit lens 24-70mm F4 ($600 cost with body). I think the Fujifilm XT3 is a wonderful camera, but your need to dis other brands shows a need to justify your camera. It’s not the perfect camera for everybody, due to the couple of corners that were cut in the video realm and the overall speed/power of the Z5. Please wake up. They are unlikely to survive. I was interested in the small size. Isn't Gold award a little bit too high for a camera that is so slow to focus? Pinpoint fails consistently, the others fail inconsistently. Where the S glass is needed is for video, as it's silent to focus and very smooth switching focus areas. I would like to default to subject tracking with moveable focus box and then press Fn1 or another custom button to switch to single point AF. The new camera will be available for special order in early 2021. Once you see it, it's almost impossible to unsee it. True, but aiming for a full frame sensor this time around. So sure if someone wants a 5 year old camera that doesn't include all of the improvements that Sony came to introduce later, then the a7RII is there. There have to be differences. And again.. people complain that smaller sensors don't have enough DR and blow out highlights. The Z5 is very well-built, both in terms of its physical ruggedness, and the ergonomics & customization. A great mirrorless video camera from Nikon? Raw files provide impressive detail capture and good noise performance. If the Z5 were more similar to Z6 it would be a Z6. Everything else has been a great experience so far! NexLupus, their own DPReview TV made a video on that Firmware 3.0, and stated that its AF is still mediocre at best, as pretty much all other youtubers say, as people that I know personally say. However, cameras using more modern (dual-gain BSI) sensors, like the Z6 and a7 III, show slightly less noise at very high ISOs in shadow regions. @ionbar, yes I want FF 4K uncropped for $1400 because it’s possible. It has a very nice sensor and will be great for landscape or static subjects. Bernard Lang What do you mean by the Canon R5/6 are not selling well? ShameHad they installed 2 slots in their first 2 z, they would have made a lot more money. Now this is the '2020 "EOS 6D"! Enjoy the new comments above. In the $1300 gray / $1.400 US price range of the Z5, Sony only offers the A7R II ($1.300), which isn't bad, at all. Slow focus? Best entry-level full-frame mirrorless camera: Nikon Z5 vs. Canon EOS RP, Nikon Z5 Hands-on Review (+compared to Nikon Z6), Best Mid-Range Full Frame Mirrorless: Canon R6, Sony a7 III, Nikon Z6 II, Panasonic S5. The 24mm F3.5, 35mm F2 and 65mm F2 DG DN share similar designs and have weather-sealed metal bodies. Like: This camera is SOSO.But great for the price. When we first reported on the alleged ransomware attack back in August, Canon said it was 'investigating the situation.' Most can't tell the difference between 42MP and 24 MP, esp those interested in a lower priced more entry level FF. That is the difference between native adapters like the FTZ and third party system adapters. Here it is: The Nikon Z5 is very impressive indeed, and worth more than “every penny”, that’s for sure! I agree with mkowalski. It is the worst I’ve seen in a mirrorless camera. So, you have less flexibility in editing shots. Most people shop to a budget and see what features they can get. You don't need to spend a fortune to buy a camera that's designed for videography. But saying the A7ii is good value is a joke. I agree. Sell the 24-50 and get a refurb 24-70/4 for <$600. So, more or less the image quality is expected to remain the same as of Nikon D750. Deliverator: Our first troll of the day, with a typically stupid comment that trolls like to make. Awards and scores are relative to the category the camera is in. The Nikon Z5 is the first Nikon to feature Animal AF out of the box, but it works best if your furry subjects are relatively static. I also bought the camera after this review. Like, wow, the last 4 years of mirrorless product and yall still dont get it? And, in our experience, ISO 12800 is is usually more than any normal photographer will ever need!). The only lens that I had that could kind of keep up was the Tamron 17-35mm 2.8-4. Find out now by reading our in-depth Nikon … Being able to lock focus in challenging conditions is one thing, and Nikon has already been doing well in that regard, thanks to numerous firmware updates provided for the Z6 and Z7 over the last two years. It’s been 2 years since the Z6/7, and I would have preferred a higher res sensor in the 6ii for a few hundred more. A pity Fujifilm chose APS-C (and mini-large format): the retro ergonomics are wonderfully zen. IMHO Canon and Sony will eat the FF mirrorless space within a year or two. Gee four or five years ago, adapting EF glass to Sony was the Renaissance because that meant full frame Sony had full frame and more lenses than anyone. We got a single $1200. All of the sample images in this review were taken using the 24.5 megapixel Fine JPEG setting, which gives an average image size of around 12Mb. The advantage of mirrorless is using the OSPDAF to work for both through the EVF shooting as well as shooting using the back screen. Now I know it's a Fuji specific site so obviously it will biased, but the point is the pictures. Switching focus modes, turning the camera on and off will solve focus issues eventually but I can't imagine having a client or a difficult subject in front of me, trying to deal with these failures. RP! @ Wezre - well you list the few existing (some still lack availabillity) Nikon Z lenses, and still they are more expensive. BSI has been shown to make little difference in FF sizes. * Subject tracking in video is poor, while the complete auto 'Wide' mode is prone to jump to the background or between subjects in complex scenes. Ignore anyone that brings up the RP at all. Moreover, throughout the scene, the Z5 captures detail$(document).ready(function() { $("#icl-5208--1052973566").click(function() { ImageComparisonWidgetLink(5208); }); }) on par with the best in the segment. Sony a7rII is an old piece of technology, with single card slot, worse EVF, no touch menu controls, really bad colors, poor battery life, and not so great AF. With Fuji there's no way to bring that information back as it's rounded out when the image is saved. It can entirely replace an f2.8 flagship zoom in most cases, if you keep an S 50mm f1.8 in your bag for real low light situations. One could apply film grain to the portraits, I suppose. Nikon Z5, Nikkor Z 85mm f/1.8 S | 1/2500 sec, f/1.8, ISO 6400. The best cameras for under $1000 should have good ergonomics and controls, great image quality and be capture high-quality video. But, when I buy a wine listed as a good value in Wine Spectator, I look for those that score at least 90 with a price tag under $25. Nikon Z5 review: the best value stills-oriented full-framer, better result than the Z5's logical peers, Camera w/ 24-50mm w/ Nikon Mount Adapter FTZ,,, They listed AF stuff under both the "Pros" and "Cons": * Continuous Eye-AF gives ground-breaking hit rate for portrait, candid, event photography. But, whatever keeps you happy. Although the Z5 doesn't get the latest and greatest 24MP sensor in Nikon's arsenal, it does deliver impressive image quality across a wide range of situations. Pros: Image Quality. The rear camera (or cameras) on an iPhone has all the latest bells and whistles, but how do you use them to capture a selfie or record a video of yourself? This gave some folks reason to fear that high ISO image quality would not be as impressive as the Nikon Z6 and Nikon D780, which have set a very high bar that roughly matches even the Sony A7 III and Sony a9 II. Did they leave money on the table? FTZ means F to Z, or Nikon F (SLR & DSLR) mount to Nikon's new mirrorless Z mount. Just like Sony did. Would it perform great with these Dslr lenses? Here’s a selection of prices. The D600, 750 and Z6 have essentially similar sensors with comparable IQ, and now the Z5? Point control and Eye and Lock-on with third-party lenses were all fixed with updates. So, there's your quick recap. Oh yeah, it's EVF and back LCD weren't so great either...and it has no touch menu controls. For the Sony A7 III be ready to shell out a lot of money, since it's NOT an entry level camera. Video is not an advantage of mirrorless. Matthew Saville is a full-time wedding photographer at Lin & Jirsa Photography, and a senior editor & writer at SLR Lounge. Either way, the value is obvious- no other full-frame camera has debuted at a price this low, and offered this many features. The camera as described has too many limitations IMHO to deserve the top gold award, and despite being described as close to the Z6, it actually has a lot of significant differences. The A7iii is what I consider the first usable Sony A7 camera. It's also available in France with the 24-200mm lens:, or, body only: Shoot a a mid-length portrait (face covering about 1/8 of the frame. It has great handling, good shooting speeds and autofocus, nice image quality … Again, not bagging on Canon colors or rendering here-but you can make Fuji colors look almost any way you want between the film sims themselves, tweaking their parameters in the Q menu, or the raws. Canon cannot even fill sales orders. Going with your logic, Canon is also doomed which it isnt. * Lock-on AF still remains unpredictable / unreliable. The Z50 is a good, but not exceptional, debut for Nikon's Z mount APS-C mirrorless system. StoneJack, why shouldn’t we be able to compare two similarly priced cameras? To our surprise, the Z5 mostly held onto even fast-moving subjects just fine, even with the constraint of a rather dark f/6.3 aperture! *shrug* Enjoy your Nikon. Its a good approach. I shot with mostly F-mount lenses when I first got my Z6, then bit the bullet and sold it all for S-line Nikkors. For now, the app is in beta and limited to a handful of Samsung Galaxy smartphones, but as development continues, it's safe to assume support for other Android devices is on the way. How did Nikon make such an affordable full-frame camera, one that at a glance seems not make any compromises in terms of physical quality, nor image quality? Are you still in the dream of R5 and sony alpha camera. Under normal logic Nikon would sell these by the droves. And yes, the R/5D Mark Iv was launched years back and some say the comparison is kinda irrelevant. The Z6 was from August, 2018 and it wasn’t quite state of the art when announced. At this point, I would rather get the D780. I just use the LCD for menu and reviewing images. Planning to treat yourself to a new full-frame camera this holiday season? By comparison, the Nikon Z6 when using the latest firmware update gives about the exact same results. just crazy. Don't know what to tell ya. Don't talk about something you never tried. But remember, a used Eos R/5D Mark 4 today still more expensive than the Z5 body only. While the face/eye detect did work pretty good it was still slow to acquire a lock after pressing the shutter button. Vaporware no more: the much-speculated-about Zeiss ZX1 has arrived. If you must buy Nikon, then get the Z6 or Z6II. Canon's first FF mirrorless has one slot. Wow, shocking, just shocking! I'm watching this on a 32" 4K monitor, I put my glasses on and zoomed in. This may not be important at all for you. It’s the secret behind the camera’s sensational photo and video quality, autofocus performance, low-light capabilities, distortion control, image clarity, color reproduction and more. I know this sounds harsh but it is true of my experience with the camera. (Rolls eyes). In other words, you won’t be disappointed by the Z5’s autofocus unless you’re really pushing the envelope of what is possible in terms of low-light AF. NR does, however seem more intelligent$(document).ready(function() { $("#icl-5216-931184306").click(function() { ImageComparisonWidgetLink(5216); }); }) at choosing what to blur and what not to, than the D750, EOS RP or Sony a7 II. Yes, all that was true 6 years ago. Nikon, Sony, Canon, Panasonic and Fuji are probably here to stay. You had to hit the OK button again to stop focus tracking. The Sony system has the advantage of being older and therefore many of the R&D costs have been paid for, so they can sell the lenses for less. Look it up. It benefits from a large image sensor, high resolution images, and a great autofocusing system. I was already shooting Eterna most of the time, always for video. Or you can pay $100 more to get a gray market Z6, over the (gray) Z5. Fuji has nicely sized lenses but a lot of old formulas with slow autofocus, they need to update their glass but with beasts like the 16-55 f/2.8 or 50 f/1 you may as well go full frame. SLR Lounge helps over 1.5 million photographers master their craft. Thom Hogan's review of the Nikon Z5 mirrorless camera. oops. This is a great camera but 89%?If we follow your methodology we will have landscape oriented cameras, video oriented cameras, still oriented cameras and so on.In my opinion is that 89% is not correct. Sure the number of cases rises, but the number of deaths and the number of people in intensive care is still rather low. The answer comes from studying its rivals. Is it too good to be true, though? stand-up to A7RII un-cropped 4K. This shows that the camera is adding very, very little electronic noise to the end result and lets you take this approach to shooting in low light when there are bright details, such as neon lights, that might be blown-out if you use a high ISO setting. F mount 70-200mm VR II is available second-hand in great condition at $1000/€1000. Can't the Z5 shoot 1080p just fine, and doesn't it spit out HDMI to an external recorder if you need it? ", This was not my experience. It turns out, photographers don’t like to work this way. Canon users are ranting, rightfully so, about the R5/R6, but canon has been far behind in DR for a decade. They may be having a second wave, but overall the Euros are so, so much better equipped to handle it than our "Democrat hoax" touting "stable genius" over here in the good ole' US of A.. it's a safe bet that they will be far less badly effected by it than us "Were #1!" DJI's second-generation Pocket camera includes a long list of useful upgrades including a wider, faster lens, a larger sensor, more resolution, improved audio and an optional handle that significantly improves control and supports live streaming. (Heck, the Nikon Z5 has more in common with the $2,500 Canon EOS R6 than the EOS RP! The Nikon Z5 is an entry-level full-frame mirrorless camera that looks and handles almost exactly like its higher-end Z-mount siblings, the Z6 and Z7. Have a look at our initial sample gallery taken on a full-frame Sony body. I agree that I would not use the Techart on a paid job requiring AF. Another likeness between the Z5 and Nikon’s Z6 and Z7 models is the electronic viewfinder it uses. The Sony A7ii is abysmal in use compared to the other cameras you mention. Depending on what lenses you need, you might match or beat the Z5 kit's value proposition with a more expensive body from another maker that has more price-competitive lens options. Okay, now that we’ve gone in-depth about the two most important things about a camera, (for many, though not everybody) …let’s talk about the overall performance and specs of the Nikon Z5 versus the Z6. My gear is cheaper, except the oldies 5D, A7 back into their heydays. If you are more heavily into video or any fast-action photography, the Sony will probably seem like a better value than either Nikon. EXIF is accurate, distortion and vignette correction are built-in. Nikon Z5 Mirrorless Camera Image Quality: In terms of image quality, I think the Nikon Z5 produces fantastic images. Speaking of the Techart TZE-01, I have one of those too. The $50 FTZ adapters are so existing Nikon users can use their F-mount lenses to fill in the gaps in the Z lens lineup. If you don’t need AF the a7rII is a great option, no doubt. I just didn't think Nikon would cut back on the lower priced camera's video. Then talk. * First full-frame mirrorless to truly challenge DSLR phase-detect systemsIndustry leading AF frame coverage. The title said "Best value stills oriented full framer". You can see some slight differences in color between this current generation of Nikon mirrorless cameras and the D750-generation: reds and yellows both look a tad punchier. In normal light levels, it works flawlessly with all of the Nikkor Z-mount native lenses we tested, from the kit 24-50mm to fast lenses like their f/1.8 primes. It's a niche (and pricey) product to be sure, but so far we find it to be well-designed and capable of outstanding results. Compare Nikon D750 image quality against competitors. In short, unlike the Z5 versus Z6, the EOS RP feels more like a Rebel-style beginner camera, not a full-frame 5-series camera. > This insanity has to stop. Sony is like "we are the future, tomorrows technology today, yehaw" Canon is like "The best you can get from both worlds, DSLR and mirrorless combined, Pro video we are freaking awesome" and then there is Nikon "meh, yeah we have all of that too but partly better implemented, in a more rugged and thought trough body, with more intuitive controls but nah, not going to mention it, users will find out anyway".Nikons bad marketing is the reason why so many people think so poor of the brand although they deliver the best products of all.So if they ever invest in better Marketing it's looking bad for others... while Canon and Sony on the other hand, for them it's more difficult they already have the best marketing and improving products is more demanding. What are some of the goods, bads, and uglies of the Nikon Z5? The possibility to shot 4K full frame is important, ultra wide angle lenses are very often used in video. The A7R2 was and still is a game changer and at $1,298 is the camera bargain of the century. Canon R5 vs Nikon Z5. The autofocus is much faster and reliable in the Z50. No price is given at this time, but the adapter is set to be available by the end of the year. You can shoot stills in Eterna. Z 5 is powered by Nikon’s fast, comprehensive Expeed 6 image processing system. I said months ago that as long it shoots HD video competitive with costlier cameras it'd meet my needs. Here is a quote from the review... (Part 2) "The Z5 offers solid autofocus performance whether using traditional subject tracking, face/eye detect, or simply a single AF point/area. There are no boring cameras, only boring photographers. You could get a used Nikon D750, and get roughly the same image quality if that’s all that matters to you, plus of course the dual SD card slots, hand-me-down flagship autofocus, and great battery life that made the D750 legendary. In fact, you’re far more likely to see a significant difference (much, much worse performance) by grabbing literally any 24-megapixel full-frame camera, and then accidentally under-exposing an ISO 6400 or ISO 12800 by just 1 EV, let alone 2 EV. Keep in mind that Euro prices include VAT. If you want new tech your gonna get it with them well before Nikon roles it out. And now Nikon. If you hand someone a Z5 and an a7RII, and just have them choose on feel, I bet most choose the Z5. There are people that lost two SD cards at once.Everywhere I look I see people bashing Z6/Z7 for single card slot,and when Z5 comes out - the R/RP is better alternative and it has a single SD! They had only one SD card slot! You talk like you’re comparing marketing strategies and not camera systems. As in, "Best SO cameras for under $2,000.". Our verdict: the Nikon Z5 achieves par for the course in terms of full-frame image quality, despite being by far the most affordable Nikon FX body ever made. Casual video shooters probably won’t notice the difference, but if you’re truly serious about video, the Z6 will be well worth the extra $400. It's quality is better in Super-35 cropped 4k, but then you're back to the Z5 crop, more or less, and the Z5's autofocus is much better. Let’s go into detail about the key drawbacks of the Z5 that might incline you to buy a Z6 instead. The bottom line is that if you want a good, solid full-frame camera that is more affordable than the Z5, you’ll have to try your luck with the well-used bargain bin of older DSLRs. Still, the D750 is a good starting point for image quality. I actually like using a DSLR body and see very little advantage with mirror less since the size isn’t dramatically different and I can use F mount lenses without an adapter. Find out how the Olympus M.Zuiko 12-100mm F4 Pro does as a travel companion on a trip to Oz. @ bernardlang the Z5 is not destined to be a guaranteed success, dual card slots or not - this is not a professional level camera and as such is fairly expensive. In addition, hygenic practices have been increased everywhere, people do wear masks in highly frequented places. You talked like Z6 never existed. SIDE NOTE: I actually had to reach for the Sony a9 II, the current reigning champion of all mirrorless autofocus, (a $4,500 camera, mind you) …in order to find a comparison scenario where the Z5 started to noticeably “lose the battle”. The R and RP have only 1(one) SD (SecureDigital) slot!A XQD card is practically bomb-proof, it's as reliable as having 2 SD slots, but faster (per Sony claim). BenBecause one is full frame. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture. $1,396, (body only) $1,696, (w/ 24-50mm kit lens) $2,196 (w/24-200mm kit lens) Autofocus is sure and swift, and Nikon built some very impressive low-light capabilities into their entry-level full frame camera. Nikon full frame vs Fuji APS-C is a good laugh. What in particular is wrong with it? The Nikon Z 5, priced at $1,400 or $1,700 with a kit lens, mixes the size, ergonomics, stabilization, and even most of the image quality of the company’s pricier Z 6. So, how does the Z5’s sensor perform? I have not had any autofocus issues with my A7R II on firmware 4.01. The Nikon Z5 is available as a body only for just under $1,400. I'm happy that there's still healthy competition out there, I hope the camera sells well as it will herald good upgrades for all users no matter what their predilection. Looking also at the remarkable amount of detail present in the camera man, for having very little light on him. What's not to like? Blame physics. Bernardlang you say the R5/6 are not selling well, but are on a huge backorder list due to the huge increase of sales. Fujifilm has announced a special version of its 100MP GFX 100 for infrared imaging. I'm using my FTZ for Sigma 14/1.8, and the PF glass. The Z5 is an insanely bad value compared to the less expensive A7RII. We took a look at the field and selected the Panasonic S1H and GH5 as the best cameras for serious videographers. Top Display: Another reasonable cost cut. Forget about low light. In a year when social distancing became a way of life overnight, Senior Editor Barney Britton maintained a small sense of connection via the Fujifilm X100V. Now, as the year winds down, we're highlighting some of our standout products of the year. With an ovf the image would be clean,but then again it would be to dark to be able to discern anything. Nikon’s renowned Z series of mirrorless cameras just gained its most affordable-yet-powerful camera to date: the Nikon Z 5 camera. 'What's the best mirrorless camera?' Working in a variable light condition is easy with Nikon Z5. To keep production costs down I maintain a single card slot would have been better as the 5 is NOT a pro level camera by any stretch. That seems like a pretty ridiculous blanket statement. I've just (10/3/2020) checked that the Z5 on is EUR 1549 while the Z6 is EUR 1493, Sony A7m2 is 955, and Sony A7m3 is 1942, all prices in euros. First, the Z5 has quite a bit of image blackout when taking a picture, so if you want to “spray and pray” at the relatively modest 4.5 FPS, (the Z6 has 12 FPS, by comparison) …you’ll struggle to track very fast subjects in the viewfinder or on the rear LCD. Here’s the thing: keep in mind that the Nikon Z6 first came out as a ~$2,000 camera, and then dropped to $1,800. @refusenik, ok I've found $90 23GB XQD on amazon vs ~$20 for SD UHS. The AF of the a7rII is a well known thing, claiming it’s great only paints you as a person lacking objectivity. LCD: A reasonable place to save cost.